I was at the University of Victoria a few years ago (2004-2007). There were definitely a lot of bunnies around.
I think this is a difficult issue, because although some of the bunnies are pets that were abandoned (obviously a very bad thing), the majority were born in the wild, and have never lived in captivity. They were just munching on grass and making lots of rabbit babies, which is what rabbits do in the wild.
So there are 2 big problems here: (1) people should absolutely not abandon their pet rabbits anywhere and (2) people should not feed wild rabbits by hand (I bet that about 90% of the food they’re being hand-fed are carrots). However, I’m not sure if relocating these mostly-wild rabbits to indoor “homes” is the best solution. If anyone knows how this relocation project is going, I’d be very interested to find out.
I think I would have preferred the University/city to start fining people who were caught feeding rabbits or dropping off pets on campus. There are enough campus security officers to enforce this, and it may bring about some extra cash. UVic students really care about their campus, and there could have been some sort of “rabbit watch” campaign set up. Also, it is pretty easy to tell the difference between the wild rabbits and the pet rabbits – I think it was a good idea to round up the pet rabbits for adoption elsewhere. However, I think I would have liked to see the wild population continue living their lives in their homes. Possibly spaying/neutering would be necessary, however there are also natural predators (birds of prey) that could help keep the wild population in check.
Finally, I get the distinct impression from the University and local media that the rabbits were considered a “problem”, not because people were concerned for the rabbits’ welfare, but more out of the perception that the rabbits were “pests”. Aside for some possible issues relating to landscaping, I’m not sure what the negative impact of the rabbits were to the University. I kind of wish we would have just learned to live and let live.
Anyway, this is just my opinion on a complicated issue. I completely understand if others disagree. And I welcome criticism of my points above, since I never really understood the problem with having a wild rabbit population on campus. (Incidentally, has anyone been on a university campus without wild rabbits?)
By the way, I don’t want to blame the students for the “rabbit problem”. I mainly saw families with young children feeding the bunnies, and I’m willing to bet that a lot of pet rabbits were dropped off by families as well, when the kids lost interest. The students are rather attached to the rabbits, and I think they could have been harnessed to help educate the public. However, perhaps my perception is wrong and this was the only solution available. I obviously don’t know the whole story…