kind of OT, proposed new Missouri law.

Forum

OUR FORUM IS UP BUT WE ARE STILL IN THE MIDDLE OF UPDATING AND FIXING THINGS. SOME THINGS WILL LOOK WEIRD AND/OR NOT BE CORRECT. YOUR PATIENCE IS APPRECIATED. We are not fully ready to answer questions in a timely manner as we are not officially open, but we will do our best.

You may have received a 2-factor authentication (2FA) email from us on 4/21/2020. That was from us, but was premature as the login was not working at that time.

BUNNY 911 – If your rabbit hasn’t eaten or pooped in 12-24 hours, call a vet immediately! Don’t have a vet? Check out VET RESOURCES

The subject of intentional breeding or meat rabbits is prohibited. The answers provided on this board are for general guideline purposes only. The information is not intended to diagnose or treat your pet. It is your responsibility to assess the information being given and seek professional advice/second opinion from your veterinarian and/or qualified behaviorist.

What are we about? Please read about our Forum Culture and check out the Rules.

BUNNY 911 – If your rabbit hasn’t eaten or pooped in 12-24 hours, call a vet immediately! Don’t have a vet? Check out VET RESOURCES

BINKYBUNNY FORUMS

This topic has 1sd reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 6 months ago by Hannah.

Viewing 1 reply thread

Author

Messages
- 03/07/2008 at 6:15 PM
  angoralvr
  Participant
  500 posts
  I wasn’t really sure where to post this. . .
  
  Ok, so Missouri has a new proposed ban on “wild” animals. . . But their list of “wild” animals includes most birds and reptiles that people commonly keep as pets. . . The law does allow for people to keep the animals they currently have but only if they take out extra insurance in case their canary kills someone and only if they pay a fee each year to keep the pet. . .This one does not include rabbits, but it is only one very small step away from banning rabbits as pets IMO.
  
  The bill does have a few good points. It does not allow anyone who has been charged with animal cruelty to ever posses one of these animals or keep the ones they currently have (this should be law IMO) and it requires that the animals keepers provide adequate care for the animals.
  
  This law is actually pretty scary if you ask me. . . Here’s a link, it’s a petition, but it also has the text of the bill at the top of the page.
  
  http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/sto…ll-1847-urgent
- 03/08/2008 at 7:57 PM
  Hannah
  Participant
  274 posts
  Your link isn’t working, however, I agree, that’s some bizzarre legislation. I know in MA we already have *very* strict pet laws, but… wow, nothing that bad. I’m sorry, if something is domesticated, it’s not a “wild animal,” even if wild versions of said animal exist. People are DUMB!
Author

Messages

Viewing 1 reply thread

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.